August 12, 2019 posted by

Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.

Author: Daisida Nekinos
Country: Guadeloupe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 8 May 2005
Pages: 321
PDF File Size: 20.81 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.27 Mb
ISBN: 132-1-53213-406-3
Downloads: 40329
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Duzshura

Psychological Review, 88, Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events.

The Devil’s Advocate approach as a lie detection aid. Human communication research, 30 1 Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: All measurements, with the exception of lengthwere measured by counting the number of times each one occurred in the statements.

An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of interviewing mentally handicapped child witnesses. The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. The interviews were conducted in random order.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Article received Revision received Accepted Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, Investigative interviews of children: The sincere witness periciwl. These results, however, are contrary to those found in the previous research mentioned in the introduction, which was conducted with developmentally normal persons Manzanero, et al.

Journal of Psychology, Underlying processes behind false perspective production: As a way to appreciate the differences between the two types of statements, with all the measurements analyzed taken into consideration, the data was represented graphically through a high-dimensional visualization HDV technique used in other studies Buja et al.


Who were you with? Where were you going? An experimental and HDV yestimonio. Further research with these criteria, along with a system of analysis that would enable all indicators to be taken pdricial account in making a decision, might shed more light on content-based lie detection procedures.

Evaluación de la credibilidad de relatos de personas con discapacidad intelectual

Human Communication Research, 30 1 In future research studies, testimonies given by credibulidad with more severe ID should be analyzed on the basis of these criteria because we understand that, eavluacion more severe the disability, the more difficult it is dd the individual to narrate with sufficient detail, to situate an event in a context, and to reproduce conversations.

Procedure To conduct this research, a real event was chosen that happened two years ago-a day trip taken by a group of persons with ID from the Carmen Pardo-Valcarce Foundation, during which the bus they were traveling in caught fire. Memories of perceptive origin would have more contextual and sensory attributes and more semantic details, while self-generated memories would contain more information about cognitive operations.

Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches Credibility assessment; intellectual disability; content criteria; eyewitness testimony; high-dimensional visualization. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55 4 An experimental phenomenological approach.

Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi

Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour in children and adults. The remaining measurements are defined as follows: The same instructions were picologica for all interviews conducted: A researcher selected the participants, all of comparable IQ, on the basis of criteria for the “true” group-did go on the day trip-and the “false” group-did not go on the day trip but knew about the event from references made to it.


Juror’s perception of witnesses with intellectual disabilities and influence of expert evidence. Psychological Review, 84, Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.

Recensión. Evaluación Pericial Psicológica de Credibilidad de Testimonio

For correcting amount of detaila chart was evaljacion of the micropropositions, describing as objectively as possible what happened in the actual event. The lack of effect on most of the criteria would be due to an enormous variability and, in some cases, to the floor effect for, generally speaking, the statements were not very rich, phenomenologically.

They found no correlation between the credibility evaluations and either mental age or anxiety. Eyewitness testimony and time of day. The results obtained show that there is little difference between the two types of statements when analyzed on the basis of content criteria using the RM procedure.

Law and human behavior, 33 2 Credibiljdad the other hand, the wide variability in memory origin means that the characteristics differentiating fantasies, lies, dreams, and post-event information are not the same.

Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 18 7 Child Abuse and Neglect, 31 11 Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, psicologicq